Buy
now at: |
 |
Book Review
New
Philanthropy Benchmarking - Author: Kristina
Anna Kazarian
Book
Review by Jed Emerson
(Senior
Fellow, William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, Lecturer, Stanford Graduate
School of Business, Bloomberg Senior Research at Harvard Business School,
and co-founder of the Roberts Enterprise Development Fund)
New
Philanthropy Benchmarking: Raising the Performance Bar, Increasing Value
Beginning
in the 1980s, those in the nonprofit sector witnessed the entry of a new
set of players into their midst. The new wealth of Wall Street, followed
later by the dot-com entrepreneurs and others benefiting from the unprecedented
growth in the US economy, made for the creation of not simply a new class
of ultra-high net worth individuals, but individuals who having created
revolutions in business began turning their attention to the social causes
of our day. Whether one labels these emerging players venture philanthropists
or simply new donors, they came bringing not just their checkbooks, but
their business skills and mindset as well. For a sector more accustomed
to directing donors to the annual dinner than the next staff committee
meeting, this influx of new, engaged players was in some ways controversial
and in others beneficial‹but regardless of whether they were welcomed
or feared, their presence has clearly been felt.
The
latest effort to help define this new breed of donor and the tools they
wield is offered by Kristina Anna Kazarian and is entitled, "New Philanthropy
Benchmarking: Wisdom for the Passionate." Part textbook, part call to
action, New Philanthropy Benchmarking - written by a newcomer with a critical
eye guided by obvious enthusiasm for the social mission of the nonprofit
sector - offers a broad critique of traditional foundation and nonprofit
practice as well as suggestions for the improvement of philanthropic performance
through the application of proven benchmarking techniques.
The
book is built around seven "wisdom points" taken from Kazarian's observations
of the field, readings of its scholars and research of leading philanthropists
- whom she calls "capitalist/philanthropists" or simply "CPs" in order
to distinguish them from both those who manage foundations and those of
inherited wealth. These seven wisdom points - ranging from issues of opportunities
for "profound transformation" to those of more basic challenges of strategy
- present her general thesis that the sector has a great deal more to
learn from business practice and that such lessons can be put to valuable
use by both donor and grantee.
But
New Philanthropy Benchmarking is not simply the standard call for nonprofit
organizations to become "more business-like." From the start, Kazarian
consistently advances the position that the social sector has great value,
however it also holds untapped potential to change lives, communities
and the world. She refers to this as the "value gap" and in this regard,
her writing encourages us to do more and achieve yet greater things than
the sector has managed to date.
Kazarian
is balanced in her approach to the topic in that she champions the use
of performance benchmarking by not only the organizations that receive
charitable support, but by foundations as well. In advancing this argument
she launches some of her most provocative broadsides against traditional
philanthropic practice and does so through presenting a number of cases
to back up her perspective - even including an appendix entitled, "Social
Sector Misfortunate Situations" as a kind of "top-ten list" of failed
philanthropy.
The
audience for this book consists of a broad cross-section of philanthropists,
foundation executives and nonprofit managers, and therefore the book is
itself simultaneously sweeping and focused. As such, New Philanthropy
Benchmarking is offered as a comprehensive guidebook for those interested
in not simply an introduction to performance benchmarking, but in developing
a better understanding of how the technique might best be imported for
use in the nonprofit sector. It is a welcome tool to assist one in moving
through the philanthropic forest - by turns focusing in on the detail
of the trees while at other times providing a "bird's eye view" of the
general strategic approaches of benchmarking and how they play out within
a philanthropic context. In that sense, the book acts as both compass
and map in assisting the newcomer to understand terms and concepts along
with their actual application in practice.
New
Philanthropy Benchmarking does address what has become the required issue
of metrics for accountability, yet its presentation of metrics (which
ranges from Blended Return on Investment frameworks to the calculation
of a multiplier/discount effect for foundation investment) is nicely balanced
with a set of philanthropic mini-profiles that provide the reader with
a look into the mindset and philosophy of seven "CPs" currently active
in philanthropy. Profiles based upon both primary and secondary resources
provide interesting facts regarding not simply the philanthropic goals
of such donors, but their personal motivations as well.
In
addition to the core chapters discussing various aspects of the concept
of philanthropic benchmarking, there is also a trove of information at
the end of the book. Indeed, while the observation may sound unusual,
the book's greatest contribution may ultimately be found not in its chapters,
but in its appendices. With 21 separate appendices, more than half the
book offers detail and reference for the reader's future exploration.
As such, New Philanthropy Benchmarking is best suited not for
a single reading, but as a reference book to which one may turn when looking
for a wide variety of ideas, concepts and additional resources on performance
benchmarking.
Overall,
the book might have benefited from a stronger editorial hand, however
that fact emphasizes the numerous nuggets one finds among its pages that
together make it a useful orientation to both the general field of benchmarking
practice and its possible applications within the social sector. The book
is as provocative and engaging as its author, from whom the nonprofit
sector will no doubt hear more over the years to come.
|